Abscondance
2012 PLD 222 SCRight of bail could not be refused to accused merely on account of his alleged abscondance which is a factor relevant only to propriety.
2009 PLD 53 SC
Abscondance of accused--Impact---Mere absconsion of accused is not conclusive proof of guilt of an accused person; it is only a suspicious circumstance against an accused that he was found guilty of the offence which
2010 MLD 1320
Relevance and corroborative value of abscondence cannot be denied on any interpretation of law applicable to it---Strength or weakness, sufficiency or otherwise of abscondence, can be a matter of debate in a given
2007 YLR 228
Regarding abscondence of co-accused, it was fact that no' proceedings under Ss.87/88, Cr.P.C. had been initiated against him---Co-accused was behind the bars since his arrest---Even otherwise, refusal of bail on the
2007 MLD 275
Mere abscondence of accused which was not proved to judicial satisfaction, would not be enough to warrant conviction, as the factum of abscondence would be a corroboratory piece of evidence and not substantive
No comments:
Post a Comment